摘要：城际公交总站作为公交设施发挥作用，效率往往较低。城际巴士乘客更喜欢在航站楼外转车。连通性因素是对乘客需求的考虑(Abdullah et al.， 2018)，其指标之一是交通位置的可达性。目前，对于乘客从出发地或到达城市目的地的便捷公交位置距离没有标准。这些标准被编入客运服务水平（LOS）中，作为一种有效的工具，根据乘客对A级服务水平（非常接近）、B级服务水平（接近）、C级服务水平（相当接近）、D级服务水平（稍微远一点）、E级服务水平（远）和F级服务水平（非常远）的感知来评估位置的质量。研究和案例研究是在望加锡市进行的。数据通过问卷调查获得。律分析方法采用逐次区间标度法和回归法。研究结果表明，旅客预期的过境距离为:LOS A-B<2 los="" 1-4="" 1-12="" 1-20="">20 km。交通区位距离道路的距离为:LOS A-B < 100m, LOS C为100- 1000m, LOS D为1001- 2000m, LOS E为2001-2400m, LOS F为> 2400m。
关键词：城际公交，服务距离，服务水平，逐次区间缩放，乘客感知
Abstract:Intercity bus terminals function as transit facilities that tend to be less effective. Intercity bus passengers prefer to transit outside the terminal. The connectivity factor is consideration of the passengers’ needs (Abdullah et al., 2018), one of its indicators is accessibility to or from the transit location. At present, there is no standard for a convenient transit location distance for passengers from the place of origin or to a destination in the city. The criteria are compiled into the passenger transit level of service (LOS), as an effective tool to evaluate the quality of the location based on passengers’ perceptions with the scales LOS A (Very Near), LOS B (Near), LOS C (Rather Close), LOS D (A Little Far), LOS E (Far) and, LOS F (Very Far). The research and case study were conducted in Makassar city. The data were obtained through questionnaires. Law Successive interval scaling and regression were used as the methods of analysis. The results of the research indicate that the transit distances expected by passengers were as follows: LOS A-B is<2 km and LOS C is 2,1-4 km , LOS D is 4,1-12 km, LOS E is 12,1-20 km and, LOS F is >20 km. Moreover, the distances of the transit location from roads were as follows: LOS A-B is < 100m, LOS C is 100- 1000m, LOS D is 1001-2000 m, LOS E is 2001-2400m and LOS F is >2400 m.
Key: Intercity bus transit, Service Distance, Level of service, Successive Interval Scaling, Passenger Perception
全文: DOI